|
|
|
|
TO: Chair Dingfelder and FR: Kristina McNitt RE: HB 2785 – small hydro projects _________________________________________________________ March 19, 2007 For the record, I am Kristina McNitt representing the Oregon Water Resources Congress, a trade association made up of a variety of non-potable water suppliers such as irrigation districts, water control (flood) districts, and private ditch companies. HB 2785 is a bill that is fully and enthusiastically supported by the Water Congress and was developed in concert with the Oregon Farm Bureau Federation. The concept is to create a simplified, faster process to get small hydroelectric projects up and on line. The qualifying conditions to participate in the simplified process set forth in HB 2785 are that 1) the applicant must already have an underlying water right within a delivery system; and 2) the proposed hydro project qualifies for a FERC exemption. In the event that both of these conditions are met, an application could then be made which would include the following items:
After receipt of the information contained in the application, the Water Resources Department must issue a public notice and allow for a 30 day comment period, after which a certificate may be issued if the proposed project is determined to not impair or is not detrimental to the public interest. An important off-ramp contemplated in HB 2785 is found in Section (4) where the Department is given the authority to re-examine the application if issues related to the public interest have been identified. Although HB 2785 expedites the process, it does not make light of resource protections, namely every certificate that is issued would be required to meet the following conditions:
HB 2785 remains a work in progress, with many interested parties working on amendments to bring forward at a future work session. The Water Congress strongly supports this bill due to its potential to assist districts getting hydro projects up and running. As more and more pressure develops on our over-appropriated water across this state, conservation measures are the only way to create “new” water. In some districts, piping the delivery of existing water diversions can conserve up to 40% of lost water. This “new” water is statutorily directed, in part, to be put to in-stream uses for fish protection. The balance of the “new” water can then be put to beneficial use on new lands under agricultural production. There is no other tool under Oregon statute that creates such a powerful win-win outcome. However, the downside is tremendous costs to districts - and ultimately the farmers who pay the fees - for piping projects. Small hydro power projects enable the districts to generate power and revenue in a non-consumptive use that benefits both their patrons and their environmental communities. |